[quote=“DWhite”]
[quote=“eccentric”]
Come on… The police might not have had enough evidence to prove he knew what the deal was, but we’re smarter than that. He was there for a special massage.
Still–it shouldn’t matter. His stance in this area is wrong, so good for him for ignoring it. Legalizing and regulating prostitution is the way to make it safer–it’s keeping this stuff illegal that turns these places into rape boutiques.
Again, aside from the idea that what he did seems to be contradictory to his own politics, who cares what a grown man does in his free time as long as he does it safely and respectfully?
Again, I’m not trying to smear Layton–but he’s running for Prime Minister. Fantino isn’t.[/quote]
Now don’t you “come on” me. I am well aware of what might have happened. I am trying to clarify what is upsetting our two critics the most.
Something happened 15 years ago. It has now been leaked to the press. Is getting a special massage 15 years ago something to fuss over? And why?
And for the absolute record. I do not particularly like Jack Layton. I will be voting for Nathan Cullen but Jack Layton leaves me cold.
And I am curious. Which is the greater problem. A leader who got a special massage 15 years ago or a leader who has several people surrounding him and representing him who have been involved in political scandals.[/quote]
Thank you DWhite!!!
I certainly do not care forthe idea of supposed police records being made public, when no offence has been committed and no charges laid nor do I care for a new organization that publishes this type of innuendo. The fact this “Story” was published by the new Fox North is priceless. It seems the new Fox North is flexing it’s NeoCon Muscle now.
I’m going to say the greater problem is a Prime Minister who had as his closest advisor and “Political Fixer” a disbarred lawyer who has been repeatedly charged with fraud and our sitting Prime Minister pretends not to notice something is amiss when one of his inner circle brings a 22 year old escort as his date to the prime minister’s official residence. It defies common sense that a Prime Minister who knows about one criminal conviction would not ask a few very pointed questions to both Mr. Carson and the people that are charged with doing background security checks. Harper either lied about knowing the full extent of Carson’s past or is a fool. I’m thinking Harper is not a fool. To me a Prime Minister who has a supporter of the Tamil Tiger terrorist organization running for the Conservative party has more of a judgement problem than Mr. Layton.
The record of this prime minister and his ongoing attack on Canadian Democracy, his willingness to import the worst of American politics and ideas to Canada and his relentless pursuit of destroying Canadian values of tolerance is much more of an issue to me than a man who allegedly according to a recent leak from undisclosed sources entered a massage parlour fifteen years ago.
While political dirty trick is nothing new… witness the RCMP files kept on Tommy Douglas, This type of smear campaign and attack on individual reputations has become too common under Harper. Look at the way our diplomat Richard Colvin was attacked by the Harper Cons for simply telling the truth when he was ordered to appear before a parliamentary committee. In summary, I strongly suspect the reasons behind this story now surfacing and frankly the fact it’s raised on this board by a newcomer that joined just as the election was brewing leads me to wonder whether we have a social media fifth column working here on behalf of the HarperCons. Sure he/she could be an agent of any other political party but the Harper Cons have shown themselves most willing to use attack and smear tactics they’ve learned from their Republican brethern.
We have no idea whether Mr. Layton went in to the massage parlour, for a therapeutic massage or a sexual massage. Eccentric believes that making assumptions is the hallmark of intelligence. It may come as a surprise but Massage Therapy is popular with many people and there is nothing sexual about it. In any event, I certainly wasn’t there… the police were and they did not charge Mr. Layton. In addition the person closest to him and best able to judge is his wife and she’s laid this fifteen year old non issue to rest.
**Mr. Layton’s wife, Olivia Chow – who is also seeking re-election – said her husband told her of the incident after it happened. “Any insinuation of wrongdoing on the part of my husband is completely and utterly false,” she said in a statement Friday. **
Frankly if we looked at the personal history of many of the worlds greatest leaders, what they do in the private lives has little to do with their effectiveness as a leader. We’ve had prime ministers that consulted mediums, Churchill would be considered a drunk by today’s standards, Roosevelt hid his fraility from the US voters, Kennedy was a womanizer, Clinton was a womanizer. The fact that Layton is human and apparently has been in a committed and long term relationship with his wife is all I need to consider about his personal life.