What do you think about creating a Community Wireless Network? This would be like a big Prince Rupert LAN, not necessarily for internet access, but for sharing files, games, etc. Connections would be with wireless cards and access points.
We’d have to build the network ourselves. Maybe start with a couple of nodes and work from there.
[quote=“MiG”]What do you think about creating a Community Wireless Network? This would be like a big Prince Rupert LAN, not necessarily for internet access, but for sharing files, games, etc. Connections would be with wireless cards and access points.
We’d have to build the network ourselves. Maybe start with a couple of nodes and work from there.
Be cool but where to you put access points to get coverage? Put something on top of cityhall maybe? Cell tower above Roosevelt School?
What areas would you like to see covered? Downtown? Cowbay?
I’d be interesting in participating, getting a card or access point though, that’d be a major setback, but I’d like to get one eventually, so maybe I’d do so if I was in range of said network.
Anyway I think some kind of local network would be a great idea.
CHSS would be a great spot for an access point, since it sounds like you intend this largely for home users, and there are tons of homes in the area (most notably, mine).
We have one guy connected to another, who connects to another, etc. If you had the equipment, you’d find someone who is part of the network and connect to them.
I honestly don’t think that it would work out too well. There is still a lot of questions and not as many answers for security problems with wireless networks, in my opinion. Also, (and I could be wrong) but isn’t the amount of bandwidth always shared with wireless networks? Say we have 802.11B, would everyone have to share that same 11Mb?
Oh, and Borges, have you got a chance to try the new Windows Movie Maker? I know you hate the program, but there was just a 2.0 version released, and I was looking through it, and it sure seems to have a hell of a lot more features and stuff.
There’s only security problems for people who think that there should be layer 1 or 2 security. If you think that, then you’re very naive about how the internet works.
Wireless replaces wires. You think wires are secure?
[quote]
Also, (and I could be wrong) but isn’t the amount of bandwidth always shared with wireless networks? Say we have 802.11B, would everyone have to share that same 11Mb?[/quote]
Well, it’s 55 megabit now, but no, you’re wrong anyway. Why do you think switches and routers were invented? Wireless replaces wires. Do you think that everyone on a 100megabit network shares the 100 megabits?
ok, say this wireless company came, they wwould need a tower, and the information would have to go to somewhere, probably terrace, than to george or whatever, but we would need the use of reapeaters too… it would cost the… whoever pays, a hell of a lot for just a big LAN
I honestly think that a big wireless network would be a great idea. Dave Doucette has set up a few… he said its easy as hell, and provided you are running a secure OS on the server running the network, its as secure as any “wire” network. Of course it would be alot of work setting this up, but i’m more than sure that we can get enough help to set up the system. The range on the new 55Megabit routers is astonding… upto 10km provided there is a clear path between nodes.
What kinda security are you going to use then. Are you only gong to let people that email you or contact you to be on your wirless. Are you going to ue mac address’s for security. ?