I donât have any clue about Gardasil (except how to spell it properly).
What I mean is that there is no way to have a debate about a conspiracy theory, because all good conspiracy theories have an escape clause. No matter what evidence to the contrary, you can always say âthatâs what the government/Big Pharma/the army/the NSA/the Pope/whoever wants you to think.â
I liken it to religion, because thereâs nothing you can say to a âtrue believerâ that will disprove their particular religious ideas. You can point to contradictions, or faults in logic, but it doesnât matter, theyâll always have the escape clause: âThe Lord works in mysterious waysâ etc.
For example, even though I have no idea about Gardasil (except how to spell it), I could say that whatever it is you are talking about happened because God made it happen. Thatâs what I believe. How can you disprove that? Any logic you throw at it can just be shot down with the escape clause.
I didnât say anything about you wearing tinfoil or being a freak, please donât put words in my mouth. When you do, itâs a reflection of you, not of what I think. Iâm not sure why you are taking this as a personal attack on you, but it isnât.Â
The fact that you think it is a personal attack on you is a good reflection of your character more than it is a statement about what I actually said.
But anyway, thatâs how you know a good conspiracy theory, though, it always has a good escape clause. If it didnât, it wouldnât be a good conspiracy theory, since it would be easy to disprove.Â
Good conspiracy theories depend on not being able to prove a negative.Â