NASA Spacecraft Confirms Martian Water, Mission Extended


#1

This is very cool.  The Phoenix lander has positively identified water in the Martian soil.  With water comes the greater likelihood that Mars supported life in the distant past. :sunglasses:

[quote]NASA Spacecraft Confirms Martian Water, Mission Extended

TUCSON, Ariz. – Laboratory tests aboard NASA’s Phoenix Mars Lander have identified water in a soil sample. The lander’s robotic arm delivered the sample Wednesday to an instrument that identifies vapors produced by the heating of samples.

“We have water,” said William Boynton of the University of Arizona, lead scientist for the Thermal and Evolved-Gas Analyzer, or TEGA. “We’ve seen evidence for this water ice before in observations by the Mars Odyssey orbiter and in disappearing chunks observed by Phoenix last month, but this is the first time Martian water has been touched and tasted.”

With enticing results so far and the spacecraft in good shape, NASA also announced operational funding for the mission will extend through Sept. 30. The original prime mission of three months ends in late August. The mission extension adds five weeks to the 90 days of the prime mission.

“Phoenix is healthy and the projections for solar power look good, so we want to take full advantage of having this resource in one of the most interesting locations on Mars,” said Michael Meyer, chief scientist for the Mars Exploration Program at NASA Headquarters in Washington.[/quote]

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/news/phoenix-20080731.html


#2

Guess this means you folks mayor Pond does have some history in his line. He had me fooled and I am just here to visit the county.


#3

I’ll be very curious to hear what this is all about! :sunglasses:

http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/02/the-white-house-is-briefed-phoenix-about-to-announce-potential-for-life-on-mars/


#4

Go home Earthling… no water here!
http://a123.g.akamai.net/f/123/12465/1d/www.nationalpost.com/693063.bin?size=194x131


#5

Yeah, saw that picture…weird. :smiley:


#6

its a sea turtle with out its shell not that on common.


#7

I think you’re right, that makes sense.


#8