[quote=“DWhite”]
[quote=“Smurfette”]
Well that’s interesting, by your own recollection you seem to have identified a theme that CityWest might want to address, that being that whenever there is a phone problem everyone seems to believe it sits at the door step of CityWest. Why per chance do you think that takes place? Could it be that maybe they don’t have the most reliable of service and that for the most part system problems as described actually do belong to their technology?
The fact that people ask that question so frequently perhaps gives you the answer.
My only point is that citywest is a convenient whipping boy. Other companies have problems.
But if it makes you feel better.
CITYWEST SUCKS! IT IS TOTALLY USELESS! IT SHOULD BE SOLD!
Wow. That does feel good.[/quote]
Well whatever makes you feel better is obviously good. Never said they sucked, never said that they were totally useless. Do believe they shouldn’t be owned by the city. My only point, which seems to forever get missed is, there obviously is a “service” problem with their product delivery. The volume of complaints (both in number and in actual VOLUME) suggests that they need to provide a better product, otherwise when available some will make themselves available to other service options.