they should be branded…a big ol CSO on the forehead…Child Sex Offender branded on their foreheads…
that way our children can tell who they are…
ask victims of sexual abuse what the impact has been on their lives…
enough is enough
At the very least, the RCMP should inform the School District so the schools can alert parents and publice alike.
Oh fer fuck sakes…again with “The RCMP should…” . Stop barking up a dead horse’s ass. Gov’t entities are obligated by law to shield these dirtbags.
For a little perspective , check out, the attached site. Then pick a city with similar demographics and population to Rupert. This thread has so far only mentioned a couple of anecdotal possible pervs in town. You are dreaming if you think your situation is relatively small, or in any way manageable.
familywatchdog.us/default.asp
Did some barking awaken you? Can you suggest the proper horse’s ass to address?
Try a live one. 1-800-call-horse . And walk around to talk to the other end. Bring a crowd with you.
freerangekids.wordpress.com/2011 … is-my-son/
Thought I’d post this article regarding someone who shouldn’t be on the sex offender registry.
As a victim of sexual assault I know what it is like for those who have been attacked or are still getting abused by there predators. The numbers out there are scary and yes most times people who are sexually abused are by members of there own families or close family friends(either man or female). That is the part that scares me the most. Most victims don’t speak out as they don’t want to be harassed or looked at differently, I was attacked years ago by strangers and still don’t really like having people know, not even close family or friends. I don’t even want to think about how many children are in the care of there abusers.
Yes it sucks that the RCMP cannot let the public know when they have a predator out in public or that they are released until trial butthe public usually finds out. And for a town of Ruperts size having only a few sexual predators out is kindof ok. We could be in a larger city and have more. I know that this will ruffle some feathers but as a victim I can appreciate the fact that both the victim and predators identity is not released to the public. I would not want to have my whole community know I was attacked and by who. It would be not only terrible for myself but also those in my family and friends that I know. Who would want to go out with a girl who has basically been outted to her community for being a victim and having people look at them and stare at them? I sure do not. It is hard enough writting this even though you know my handle and not my name.
So thats why I can appreciate the identity of predators being kept quiet. But I also agree that if there is a predator in close proximity to a school, playground that there should be some posting about it. Just as a warning to the general public.
[quote=“Princess of Power”]http://freerangekids.wordpress.com/2011/09/30/the-sex-offender-down-the-street-is-my-son/
Thought I’d post this article regarding someone who shouldn’t be on the sex offender registry.[/quote]
Your example is from the US. Canadian law is different…
Section 150.1 of the Criminal Code
(2.1) When an accused is charged with an offence under section 151 or 152, subsection 173(2) or section 271 in respect of a complainant who is 14 years of age or more but under the age of 16 years, it is a defence that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge if
(a) the accused
(i) is less than five years older than the complainant; and
(ii) is not in a position of trust or authority towards the complainant, is not a person with whom the complainant is in a relationship of dependency and is not in a relationship with the complainant that is exploitative of the complainant; or
A 14 year old can have consensual sex with a 19 year old.
A 16 year old can have consensual sex with anyone of any age provided the person is not in a position of authority.
If you’re on the Canadian sex offender registry you belong there.
If a man picks up a prostitute and gets caught, he ends up on the sex offender list though. Does that make him a predator?
Here’s the list, I don’t see procuring except part ix if you’re trying to pimp out your child:
(a) an offence under any of the following provisions:
(i) subsection 7(4.1) (offence in relation to sexual offences against children),
(ii) section 151 (sexual interference),
(iii) section 152 (invitation to sexual touching),
(iv) section 153 (sexual exploitation),
(v) section 153.1 (sexual exploitation of person with disability),
(vi) section 155 (incest),
(vi.1) subsection 160(2) (compelling the commission of bestiality),
(vii) subsection 160(3) (bestiality in presence of or by a child),
(viii) section 163.1 (child pornography),
(ix) section 170 (parent or guardian procuring sexual activity),
(x) section 172.1 (luring a child by means of a computer system),
(xi) subsection 173(2) (exposure),
(xii) paragraph 212(1)(i) (stupefying or overpowering for the purpose of sexual intercourse),
(xiii) subsection 212(2) (living on the avails of prostitution of a person under age of eighteen),
(xiv) subsection 212(2.1) (aggravated offence — living on the avails of prostitution of a person under age of eighteen),
(xv) subsection 212(4) (obtaining prostitution of person under age of eighteen),
(xvi) section 271 (sexual assault),
(xvii) section 272 (sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm),
(xviii) paragraph 273(2)(a) (aggravated sexual assault — use of a restricted firearm or prohibited firearm or any firearm in connection with criminal organization),
(xviii.1) paragraph 273(2)(a.1) (aggravated sexual assault — use of a firearm),
(xix) paragraph 273(2)(b) (aggravated sexual assault), and
(xx) subsection 273.3(2) (removal of a child from Canada);
(b) an offence under any of the following provisions:
(i) section 162 (voyeurism),
(i.1) subsection 173(1) (indecent acts),
(ii) section 177 (trespassing at night),
(iii) section 230 (murder in commission of offences),
(iii.1) section 231 (murder),
(iv) section 234 (manslaughter),
(v) paragraph 246(b) (overcoming resistance to commission of offence),
(vi) section 264 (criminal harassment),
(vii) section 279 (kidnapping),
(vii.1) section 279.01 (trafficking in persons),
(vii.11) section 279.011 (trafficking of a person under the age of eighteen years),
(viii) section 280 (abduction of a person under age of sixteen),
(ix) section 281 (abduction of a person under age of fourteen),
(x) paragraph 348(1)(d) (breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit an indictable offence),
(xi) paragraph 348(1)(d) (breaking and entering a dwelling house and committing an indictable offence),
(xii) paragraph 348(1)(e) (breaking and entering a place other than a dwelling house with intent to commit an indictable offence), and
(xiii) paragraph 348(1)(e) (breaking and entering a place other than a dwelling house and committing an indictable offence);
I believe the Part B ones need some significant sex element to it for a Judge to order the offender be included on the Registry. Part A’s are a given.
Good to know laws aren’t as insane as the States’ are.