MiG MiG MiG… You’re not the first voice of dissent on this topic, nor the most well spoken, nor the most zealous, so if you’d actually like me to present my case, I will do so. But it’s slow, it’s meticulous, it’s comprehensive and takes time. I’d say a private thread should be created whilst I compiled this then invite others to discuss it. It’s too easily to be bombarded by hoardes of people in discussions like this.
Typically, I do so in groups, where I’m the speaker, I show documents, I show evidence, I show films (with permission, of course) then question/answer periods.
To do this on a public forum is just… usually futile, unfortunately.
But for sure, anyone is more than welcome, and privy to, what I know.
I completely showed that it was concrete proof of how welders and steelworkers cut down the 800 beams or so after 9/11. You want more photos of them doing so?
Now you just withdraw?
That’s the textbook definition of a conspiracy theory, isn’t it?
I content that those angles were cut by the welders after 9/11. I have a bunch more photos of them at work if you want them.
You posted that photo as evidence. You said it was obvious and funny.
I posed that it was indeed evidence. Of a great welding job. I posted the original photo, and the photos taken by the same photographer on the same day, of the welders at work making that cut.
To me, that’s pretty easily debunked your photo.
Do you not agree?
Or is your response to move on to something else rather than admit that photo is evidence of a good welding job?
To be honest, you don’t sound too open… Truly. I’ve met those who genuinely want me to present this stuff, and it doesn’t sound like you. I may be reading into your postings wrong, though.
You’re doing the Fox thing: which is to bombard, make generalizations, make accusations and so forth.
If you’re actually interested - I’ll put in the time to inform. But the prerequisite is a person’s genuine interest. There’s plenty interested and plenty will hear it – but if you’re not truly interested, just say so.
I have no qualms investing time in this, if you truly want it. Not if you don’t, though.
You certainly seemed to think it was in your first post. Obvious and Funny is what you called it.
So here’s what you said, because you keep wanting to drift to somewhere else:
My explanation for the 45 degree angle is that the welders cut it at a 45 degree angle. The same photographer who shot this photo actually took a photo of the welders making the cut. The images are linked above.
Now you asked for an explanation, and that’s it. You don’t accept it?
I think you’re confused, perhaps I mistyped something.
What makes this photo damning isn’t, alone, the cut (altho the cut itself is certainly eyebrow raising), it’s the once molten steel. And not just the the once molten steel - the color, what it consists of and so forth.